Philosophy Extended Essay Exemplar: Rawls Original Position and… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Philosophy SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent does Rawls' original position provide a moral justification for
redistributive taxation?SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Good
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You state a clear research question early and keep the essay broadly oriented around Rawls, taxation, and justification.
You explain the core philosophical frame in a logical order, which makes the argument easy to follow.
You use relevant comparative material, especially Nozick and Sandel, to support the direction of the inquiry.
Your discussion does not always stay tightly within the exact focus of the research question.
The move from Rawls’s original position to your own revised principles is not fully justified.
The methodology would be stronger if you explained more clearly why your selected sources and interpretive path are the best ones for the claim you are making.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge and understanding
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
You show strong familiarity with the main Rawlsian concepts and use them in a generally coherent way.
You apply source material effectively in the main argument, especially when explaining the difference principle and the role of taxation.
Your use of philosophical terminology is mostly accurate and sustained throughout the essay.
Some important distinctions are blurred, especially when Rawls is made to sound more collectivist than he is.
Your treatment of Sandel and the proposed virtue framework needs more conceptual precision.
Several claims are clear in intent but remain underexplained, so the knowledge shown is not always fully secure.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Poor
C.2Analysis and conclusions
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout considerations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.