Philosophy Extended Essay Exemplar: ¿Hasta qué punto Mujercitas… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB Philosophy SL Extended Essay Example

¿Hasta qué punto Mujercitas reproduce o cues1ona la construcción cultural de la feminidad a través del personaje de Jo March, según los conceptos filosóficos de “El Otro” y la trascendencia e inmanencia de Simone de Beauvoir en El segundo sexo?SL

Overall Score

27/28

Criteria A: Focus and Method

6/6

Criteria Strands

A.1Topic communication and explanation

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation and focus

Good

A.3Research methodology

Good

Criteria Feedback

You state a clear, philosophically appropriate research focus and keep the investigation anchored in a specific text and conceptual lens.
Your overall line of inquiry is organized and easy to follow, with a logical move from theory to literary application.
You explain the topic clearly and show a good sense of how the philosophical framework connects to the novel.

The question is a little broad and binary, which makes parts of the argument feel predetermined.
Some framing states the conclusion too early instead of presenting it as something that still needs to be demonstrated.
The research method is relevant, but the selection and use of some sources are not always shown with equal precision.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

6/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Application of source material

Good

B.2Subject knowledge and understanding

Excellent

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

You use Beauvoir’s ideas with a strong grasp of the main concepts and their philosophical meaning.
Your use of terminology is mostly accurate and consistent, which helps the argument stay conceptually grounded.
You connect the source material to the novel in a way that is usually relevant and purposeful.

A few claims are stated too absolutely and would benefit from tighter textual support.
At one point, your handling of Jo’s name becomes internally inconsistent and needs to be checked more carefully.
Some later interpretations could distinguish more clearly between direct evidence from the novel and your own interpretive conclusion.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

12/12

Criteria Strands

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Moderate

C.3Discussion and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

3/4

Criteria Strands

D.1Structure appropriateness

Excellent

D.2Layout considerations

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Overall Score

27/28

Criteria A: Focus and Method

6/6

Criteria Strands

A.1Topic communication and explanation

Excellent

A.2Research question formulation and focus

Good

A.3Research methodology

Good

Criteria Feedback

You state a clear, philosophically appropriate research focus and keep the investigation anchored in a specific text and conceptual lens.
Your overall line of inquiry is organized and easy to follow, with a logical move from theory to literary application.
You explain the topic clearly and show a good sense of how the philosophical framework connects to the novel.

The question is a little broad and binary, which makes parts of the argument feel predetermined.
Some framing states the conclusion too early instead of presenting it as something that still needs to be demonstrated.
The research method is relevant, but the selection and use of some sources are not always shown with equal precision.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

6/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Application of source material

Good

B.2Subject knowledge and understanding

Excellent

B.3Use of terminology and concepts

Excellent

Criteria Feedback

You use Beauvoir’s ideas with a strong grasp of the main concepts and their philosophical meaning.
Your use of terminology is mostly accurate and consistent, which helps the argument stay conceptually grounded.
You connect the source material to the novel in a way that is usually relevant and purposeful.

A few claims are stated too absolutely and would benefit from tighter textual support.
At one point, your handling of Jo’s name becomes internally inconsistent and needs to be checked more carefully.
Some later interpretations could distinguish more clearly between direct evidence from the novel and your own interpretive conclusion.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

12/12

Criteria Strands

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis and conclusions

Moderate

C.3Discussion and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

3/4

Criteria Strands

D.1Structure appropriateness

Excellent

D.2Layout considerations

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.