Loading document preview...

IB Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) SL Extended Essay Example

What is the best way to generate a tetrahedron through a 3 –dimensional kaleidoscopeSL

Overall Score

15/28

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Focus and Method

5/6

Criteria Strands

A.1Topic communication and explanation

Excellent

A.2Research question clarity and focus

Good

A.3Research methodology

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Clear and sustained focus on constructing a tetrahedral kaleidoscope with coherent topic communication
Well‐defined purpose and logical progression from background to proposed construction

Research question uses “best way” without explicit optimality criteria, slightly reducing precision
Methodology, while replicable, relies heavily on non‐academic sources and lacks rigorous justification for source selection

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

4/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Subject knowledge application

Good

B.2Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

Accurate identification and application of tetrahedral symmetry group concepts
Generally consistent and correct use of subject‐specific terminology (e.g., “permutation,” “symmetry plane”)

Occasional notational confusion (subscripts for S₃ vs S₄, β vs r notation)
Lapses in formal rigor (missing proofs of minimality and limited citation of scholarly sources)

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

4/12

Criteria Strands

C.1Research quality

Moderate

C.2Analysis depth

Poor

C.3Discussion and evaluation

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Presentation

2/4

Criteria Strands

D.1Structure appropriateness

Good

D.2Layout and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Loading document preview...

IB Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) SL Extended Essay Example

What is the best way to generate a tetrahedron through a 3 –dimensional kaleidoscopeSL

Overall Score

15/28

Was this exemplar helpful?

Want a report just like this?

Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing

Criteria A: Focus and Method

5/6

Criteria Strands

A.1Topic communication and explanation

Excellent

A.2Research question clarity and focus

Good

A.3Research methodology

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Clear and sustained focus on constructing a tetrahedral kaleidoscope with coherent topic communication
Well‐defined purpose and logical progression from background to proposed construction

Research question uses “best way” without explicit optimality criteria, slightly reducing precision
Methodology, while replicable, relies heavily on non‐academic sources and lacks rigorous justification for source selection

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

4/6

Criteria Strands

B.1Subject knowledge application

Good

B.2Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

Accurate identification and application of tetrahedral symmetry group concepts
Generally consistent and correct use of subject‐specific terminology (e.g., “permutation,” “symmetry plane”)

Occasional notational confusion (subscripts for S₃ vs S₄, β vs r notation)
Lapses in formal rigor (missing proofs of minimality and limited citation of scholarly sources)

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

4/12

Criteria Strands

C.1Research quality

Moderate

C.2Analysis depth

Poor

C.3Discussion and evaluation

Poor

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.

Criteria D: Presentation

2/4

Criteria Strands

D.1Structure appropriateness

Good

D.2Layout and formatting

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Unlock all criteria

Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.