This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) Extended Essay Exemplar:… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent can the Bayesian model of statistics be used to accurately model or predict different biases within the field of criminal justice and how does it compare to the frequentist approach to statistics?SL
C
Overall Score
14/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Research methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
You communicated your topic clearly and kept the investigation focused on the comparison between Bayesian and frequentist approaches.
Your research question is stated prominently and is repeatedly connected to the main sections of the report.
You chose a generally relevant set of methods, including real data, hypothesis testing, and sensitivity checks.
Your research question is still a little broad and combines several aims, which makes the focus less precise than it could be.
Some methodological choices are not fully justified, especially the way the sample and priors were selected.
A few parts of the investigation move beyond what the method can firmly support, which weakens overall focus.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Subject knowledge application
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You show a solid grasp of key statistical ideas such as priors, posteriors, likelihoods, Bayes factors, p-values, and chi-square testing.
You usually apply terminology correctly and use it to explain the statistical output in a meaningful way.
Your use of worked examples and visual priors helps make the ideas more concrete.
There are a few conceptual slips, especially where distribution types and posterior meaning are described imprecisely.
Some claims about what Bayesian or frequentist methods can or cannot do are too absolute.
Your explanations of some statistical terms would be stronger if they were tied more carefully to the exact data and model being used.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
3/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
