This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) Extended Essay Exemplar:… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Mathematics Analysis and Approaches (AA) SL Extended Essay Example
The Chaos Theory and its ability
to predict the Stock Market’s futureSL
B
Overall Score
19/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Research methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
The topic and purpose are communicated accurately and effectively through a clear title, introduction, signposts, and conclusion.
The research question is prominently stated, focused, and consistently linked to the analysis throughout the essay.
The three-stage methodology is coherent and generally appropriate, with logical progression from delay-embedding to Lyapunov exponent to fractal dimension.
The phrasing of the research question shifts slightly in later sections, reducing consistency of focus.
Scope is overambitious given the limited seven-week data window, weakening practical applicability.
Delay-embedding parameter choices (τ=5, ω=7) are asserted without justification or sensitivity testing, and replicability details are only partially provided.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Subject knowledge application
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
Consistent and accurate use of subject-specific terminology (Lyapunov exponent, fractal dimension, bifurcation) with clear definitions and application.
Demonstrates good conceptual understanding of chaos-theory constructs and their relevance to financial markets through worked numerical examples.
Notation is occasionally inconsistent (e.g., X(t) vs Xₙ) and contains minor typos (e.g., logistic map formula).
Explanatory passages sometimes blur mathematical precision with colloquial language, and there is no error analysis or validation of key calculations.
Repetitive definitions and reliance on secondary sources (e.g., Google Search) undermine academic rigor.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Moderate
D.2Layout and formatting
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.