History Extended Essay Exemplar: John Paul II’s Poland Pilgrimage… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB History SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent was John Paul II's rhetoric throughout his pilgrimages to Poland a significant contributor to the weakening of communist influence and the fostering of anti-communist sentiment in Poland in the late 1900s?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student communicates a historically appropriate and meaningful line of inquiry.
The student's research question is comparative and clearly tries to make a judgement rather than just describe a topic.
The student uses a reasonably broad range of sources, including primary material that fits the topic well.
The student's scope is still wider than necessary, especially with phrases like 'throughout his pilgrimages' and 'in the late 1900s'.
The method would be stronger if the student explained more clearly how they would judge 'most significant'.
Some sources are only indirectly connected to the specific Polish case.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Good
B.2Subject knowledge and understanding
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student selects source material that is mostly relevant and often directly tied to the question.
The student shows clear knowledge of communist Poland, Solidarity, the Church, and US policy.
The student uses historical terminology with reasonable accuracy and consistency.
Some claims are too inferential and need firmer evidence rather than assumption.
There is at least one important chronology error that affects the argument.
At times the student's language becomes more rhetorical than analytical.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
10/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
1/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.