History Extended Essay Exemplar: Romanian Austerity and the 1989… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB History SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent did the severe government austerity
measures from 1981 to 1989 contribute to the onset of the Romanian
Revolution?SL
Loading scores...
C
Official IB Result
IB Grade: C
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Good
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student defines a clear historical setting and a specific policy focus, which gives the investigation a solid sense of direction.
The student keeps returning to the question throughout the essay, so the reader can usually follow what they are trying to prove.
The student uses a range of source types, including legislation, historians, and contemporary material, which shows effort to build a researched investigation.
The discussion becomes quite broad in places, so the causal focus on austerity is not always sustained tightly enough.
The method would be stronger if the student explained more clearly why certain sources were prioritized over others.
Some of the source selection is broader than necessary, which makes the investigation less sharply targeted than it could be.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Good
B.2Subject knowledge and understanding
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student uses source material that is mostly relevant to the question and often directly connected to austerity and public dissatisfaction.
The student shows clear knowledge of late communist Romania, including debt repayment, rationing, repression, and the major protests of 1987 and 1989.
The student generally uses historical terminology correctly and with appropriate meaning.
Some evidence is used more to illustrate hardship than to prove its causal importance to the revolution.
At times the discussion stays descriptive rather than explaining the historical significance of the evidence in enough depth.
A few terms and distinctions need more precision, especially when separating long-term conditions from immediate revolutionary triggers.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.