Geography Extended Essay Exemplar: Bystrzyca River Spatial… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Geography SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent the spatial management of the Bystrzyca river facilitates lives of Lublin inhabitants?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Good
A.2Research question formulation
Moderate
A.3Research methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
The investigation is anchored in a clear local setting and shows a genuine attempt to answer a geographical issue with fieldwork and secondary evidence.
The student uses a relevant mix of methods, including a transect, photographs, survey data, maps, and planning sources.
The research question is clearly stated and gives the report a focused evaluative direction.
The student's topic is communicated with a clear sense of purpose from the beginning.
Key terms such as the management approach and what counts as improving residents’ lives are too broad for a tightly focused investigation.
The sampling and data-recording procedures are not explained in enough detail to judge how dependable the findings are.
The method would be stronger if the student showed more clearly why each source and each fieldwork step was chosen.
The scope of the question could have been narrowed to a specific part of the river corridor or a defined user group.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student shows solid local knowledge of the river corridor, its facilities, and its role in the city.
Relevant geographical concepts such as accessibility, recreation, revitalization, sustainability, and connectivity are used throughout the report.
The student's discussion shows awareness that the river has both social and environmental functions.
The student includes useful historical and spatial context rather than treating the area as a simple list of places.
Some knowledge is presented as description or inventory rather than deeper geographical explanation.
A few claims are too sweeping and are not always matched carefully to the evidence the student presents.
Important concepts are not consistently defined or organized into a clear conceptual framework.
The student's terminology is generally accurate, but it is not always used with enough precision to support the analysis.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research application
Moderate
C.2Analysis and evaluation
Moderate
C.3Discussion and argument
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure
Excellent
D.2Layout
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.