To what extent has the Kapkoros Tea Factory contributed to the improved quality of life of smallholder tea farmers in Kapkoros, Bomet County, from 2022–2024?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation
Good
A.3Research methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
- The student communicates a clear local focus by anchoring the investigation in Kapkoros, Bomet County and a named tea factory.
- The student's research question is specific enough to guide a geographically grounded investigation.
- The student uses a sensible mix of questionnaires, group comparisons, and secondary sources to build their method.
- The student's method does not fully explain how participants were selected within each locality and category.
- The investigation does not clearly show how the 2022–2024 time frame is being evidenced.
- The framing shifts at times between quality of life, standards of living, and HDI without fully clarifying the relationship among them.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- The student shows a solid understanding of rural development, agricultural value chains, and household livelihoods.
- The student uses a range of relevant geographical and development terms accurately in much of the report.
- The student demonstrates awareness that international indicators and locally collected evidence are not always the same thing.
- The relationship between HDI and the student's locally collected indicators is not kept consistent throughout the report.
- Some terms such as quality of life, standard of living, and HDI are used too interchangeably.
- A few indicators are presented as if they measure HDI directly when they are actually proxy measures.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research application
Poor
C.2Analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.3Discussion and argument
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure
Good
D.2Layout
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.