To what extent has the implementation of the Wei Wei Irrigation Scheme improved food security in Sigor, West Pokot County, Kenya, between 2019 and 2024?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Good
A.2Research question formulation
Good
A.3Research methodology
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student communicates a recognizably geographical investigation with a clear topic, local case study, and relevant context.
The student's research question is clearly stated, geographically specific, and framed in a way that invites evaluation rather than description.
The student uses a range of methods and shows some awareness that environmental variables and bias could affect the results.
The student's topic is grounded in a real place and is supported by maps, images, and contextual information.
The student's method is not fully coherent, because the sampling approach changes across sections and the comparison framework is not consistently explained.
The student's investigation period and the long-running history of the scheme are not fully reconciled, which makes the focus less precise.
Some claims broaden beyond the actual question and reduce the tightness of the investigation.
The student needs to define the exact indicators they will use to judge food-security change more explicitly.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student demonstrates clear understanding of the local food-security context and connects it to a real semi-arid case study.
The student uses relevant terminology such as food security, productivity, resilience, sustainability, and climate variability.
The student shows some conceptual awareness by linking irrigation to access and livelihoods rather than only to production.
The student also acknowledges bias and limitations, which shows awareness of the need for careful interpretation.
The student's use of theory is sometimes more descriptive than analytical, so concepts are stated without always being applied to the evidence.
Some claims are stronger than the evidence supports, especially where the student implies broad improvements from limited data.
Food security is treated too generally at times, without separating availability, access, utilisation, and stability.
Several important claims depend on perceptions rather than independently verified records.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research application
Poor
C.2Analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.3Discussion and argument
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure
Good
D.2Layout
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.