How effective has one acre fund been improved the living standards of farming households in Musanda ward - kakamega Kenya between 2020 and 2025.SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Good
A.2Research question formulation
Good
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- The student identifies a specific case study, time period, and set of indicators, which gives the investigation a clear direction.
- The student uses a broad range of methods and evidence, including surveys, interviews, observation, mapping, statistics, and secondary sources.
- The student shows an attempt to connect the investigation to a wider development context rather than keeping it purely descriptive.
- The link between the topic and the broader idea of alternative trade networks is not explained clearly enough.
- The sampling and data-collection process is not transparent, and the response design introduces bias.
- The investigation does not sufficiently justify why the chosen site and evidence are the best way to isolate the organisation’s effect.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- The student uses several relevant development and geography terms appropriately, such as food security, livelihood, productivity, and resilience.
- The student shows awareness of a useful framework for organising the investigation and connecting evidence to wider development ideas.
- The student draws on a range of source types to support their understanding of the topic.
- Some core concepts are not defined or applied precisely enough, especially when different economic measures are used interchangeably.
- The framework is introduced, but it is not fully unpacked or used consistently as an analytical tool.
- Some evidence is applied too broadly or without enough checking of comparability, date, or relevance.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research application
Moderate
C.2Analysis and evaluation
Poor
C.3Discussion and argument
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure
Good
D.2Layout
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.