French B Extended Essay Exemplar: Dans quelle mesure l’utilisation… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB French B SL Extended Essay Example
Dans quelle mesure l’utilisation de l’argot urbain dans les chansons de JUL a-t-elle évolué depuis ses débuts en 2014 jusqu’à aujourd’hui ?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Your investigation has a clear, relevant focus and a well-chosen title that makes the topic and time frame easy to follow.
You keep the research anchored to a clear question and use a sensible three-period structure to organise the comparison.
Your method is detailed and shows thoughtful planning, including a defined corpus and an attempt to explain how the data were selected and coded.
Your question could be made more precise by defining exactly what kind of change you are measuring.
Some methodological decisions need tighter justification, especially the coding rules for slang categories and neologisms.
A few points in the method would be stronger if you gave a clearer, more replicable record of how contested cases were handled.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application of source material
Good
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You show a solid understanding of sociolinguistic ideas and connect them appropriately to the study of rap language.
You use relevant academic and primary sources to support the investigation and give the work a genuine disciplinary base.
Your terminology is often accurate and you use key concepts such as verlan, borrowing, corpus, and lexical density in a meaningful way.
Some lexical categories are not applied consistently, especially when distinguishing borrowings, hybrids, and genuine neologisms.
A few claims go beyond what the evidence in the report securely shows, so the reader cannot always see the link between source material and conclusion.
More direct quotation or lyric-level evidence would make your interpretations more convincing and precise.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Engagement (Reflection)
Criteria Strands
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.