This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
English B Extended Essay Exemplar: Female Identity in Sula and… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB English B SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent is the quest for female identity in Toni
Morrison’s Sula similar to and different from the quest
for female identity in Maya Angelou’s selected poetry
works?SL
Loading scores...
C
Overall Score
16/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Moderate
A.3Methodology completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Topic and purpose are communicated clearly through title and introduction, with a coherent comparative focus on female identity across four life-stage lenses.
The research question is explicitly stated and generally maintained throughout the discussion, providing a sound framework for analysis.
Methodology is mostly complete, with appropriate identification of primary texts, an appendix of poems, and a works-cited list demonstrating basic scholarly convention.
The broad scope (four roles, two authors, two genres) occasionally dilutes the sharpness of focus, leading to minor digressions.
There is no explicit rationale for the comparative method or the selection of specific poems, weakening methodological transparency.
Redundant or overly wordy passages in the introduction obscure concision and could be streamlined to sharpen the research focus.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Demonstrates coherent subject knowledge of historical context and thematic concerns, linking African-American history to literary content.
Primary quotations are generally relevant and correctly applied to support interpretation.
Terminology such as “enjambment,” “imagery,” and “bildungsroman” is used accurately to aid literary analysis.
Explanations often remain at a general thematic level and lack sustained analytical depth into narrative or poetic technique.
Secondary sources are unevenly integrated and are too few to sustain a broader scholarly dialogue.
Occasional sweeping generalisations (e.g., about “inherent traits”) indicate uneven precision in applying critical concepts.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
5/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout considerations
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
