This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
English B Extended Essay Exemplar: Trump-Biden 2024 Debate Rhetoric | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB English B HL Extended Essay Example
How does the use of rhetorical strategies and language in the first 2024 presidential
debate between Trump and Biden reflect underlying socio-political tensions in the
United States?HL
A
Overall Score
23/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness
Good
Criteria Feedback
Your investigation is clearly framed around a focused research question and a relevant debate, which gives the whole essay a strong sense of direction.
You maintain clear signposting throughout, and the three-part analytical structure helps the reader follow your argument easily.
Your method is mostly well chosen for the topic, using appropriate primary and secondary sources to support a rhetorical analysis.
Your methodology would be stronger if you explained more explicitly how you selected examples and why these particular strategies were chosen.
The scope of the topic is still fairly broad at times, so some links between the evidence and the specific focus could be sharper.
A few sections lean slightly toward general political commentary rather than tightly controlled analysis of the research question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application of source material
Good
B.2Subject knowledge
Excellent
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
You show clear understanding of rhetorical and political communication concepts and apply them in a controlled way.
Your use of debate quotations is relevant and helps anchor your claims in the source material.
You use terminology such as populism, hyperbole, ad hominem, and framing accurately and consistently.
Some source references are more illustrative than deeply analysed, so the micro-level language evidence could be unpacked further.
A few statistical or contextual claims would benefit from tighter evaluation and clearer connection to the exact point being made.
Some conceptual distinctions, such as between exaggeration and hyperbole, could be made even sharper.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout considerations
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
