This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
English B Extended Essay Exemplar: Sylvia Plath, Esther Greenwood,… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB English B SL Extended Essay Example
How does Sylvia Plath portray 1950s gender norms through Esther Greenwood’s struggle in her novel The Bell Jar?SL
A
Overall Score
24/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness
Good
Criteria Feedback
The investigation’s focus and purpose are communicated with precision and consistency throughout, with a clearly stated, well‐integrated research question anchoring each section.
The framing and organization of the essay demonstrate a highly effective and appropriate methodological approach, with logical paragraphing and a coherent progression of ideas.
Minor background digressions occasionally slow the narrative flow and could be more tightly signposted to the research question.
The methodology section would benefit from an explicit statement of source‐selection criteria to underpin the strong organization already present.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application of source material
Good
B.2Subject knowledge
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
Source material is clearly relevant and is integrated with accuracy, drawing on both primary and secondary texts to support key arguments.
Subject knowledge is coherent and well structured, demonstrating sound command of Plath’s symbolism and the historical context of 1950s gender norms.
Terminology and concepts are used appropriately and consistently, enhancing the precision of the argument.
Several background sources are deployed descriptively rather than critically and would benefit from deeper appraisal of their authority or limitations.
A few claims (e.g., on birth rates or character motivations) require more precise evidence or citation to avoid generalisation.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout considerations
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.