IB English B SL Extended Essay Example

The research question is clearly focused on a definable analytical task, and it links the literary analysis to a contemporary comparison. That dual structure gives the essay direction and keeps the argument manageable.

The title is immediately purposeful and comparative: it clearly signals both the literary text and the social-media parallel, which helps the reader understand the investigation’s scope from the outset.

The title appears at the beginning of the report, which makes the essay immediately identifiable and professionally presented.

The report begins with a clearly labelled essay heading, which supports formal organization and helps the document read as a finished academic submission.

The word count is provided clearly at the start of the document, meeting the administrative requirement and helping the reader verify the submission length.

The table of contents could be even more helpful if the subheadings were formatted with slightly clearer hierarchy or spacing. That would make longer reports easier to scan without changing the content.

The table of contents is now navigable and includes page numbers, which materially improves usability and addresses the earlier presentation issue.

The opening establishes a clear purpose and contextual frame, moving from the novel to modern culture in a way that keeps the research focus visible from the start.

The essay still leans on a broad historical label without fully qualifying it. Because the novel was published in 1911 and set in a French context, the “Victorian” frame needs more careful explanation to avoid oversimplifying the historical lens.

Sectioning begins cleanly with the introduction, and the report’s internal structure is easy to navigate because each major stage of the argument is clearly signposted.

The method would be even stronger if the student briefly defined how passages were selected from the novel and what counts as evidence of “beauty standards.” A short criterion for selection would make the investigation more reproducible.

The modern comparison is introduced clearly, but the claim about the “Instagram face” would benefit from a sharper explanation of why this particular standard is the most relevant measure for the essay’s argument. At the moment it is suggestive rather than fully defined.

The essay now states what it will do rather than simply describing the topic. This explicit roadmap improves methodological transparency and addresses the earlier issue of the method being only implicit.

The section headings are analytically useful rather than purely decorative. They signal a logical sequence of ideas and make the line of inquiry easy to follow.

The main body is divided into purposeful sections rather than presented as one continuous block, which strengthens readability and supports the comparative method.

The analysis would be stronger if the student unpacked the wording of the quotation more closely. At present, the point about dehumanization is valid, but it is stated more than demonstrated through language or structure.

How does Christine’s empathy complicate the novel’s apparent opposition between beauty and goodness? Exploring that tension would deepen the essay’s evaluation of Leroux’s stance.

Consider adding one sentence on Leroux’s narrative technique here, such as how direct speech or repetition intensifies Erik’s emotional desperation. That would move the paragraph from thematic explanation to fuller literary analysis.

The comparison with contemporary media is persuasive, but the reasoning occasionally jumps from example to conclusion. The student should show more explicitly how the example proves the wider claim about social norms.

The symbolic reading of the mask is promising, but it needs more precise support. The student should show how the quotation itself invites this interpretation, rather than relying on the broader theme alone.

The conclusion is distinctly labelled, which reinforces the report’s formal structure and makes the argument’s endpoint easy to locate.

The conclusion returns directly to the research question, which shows that the essay has maintained a consistent focus throughout rather than drifting into summary.

The works cited section is clearly separated from the main body, which supports the document’s overall readability and academic convention.