English A Lit Extended Essay Exemplar: Language and Social Masks in… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB English A Lit HL Extended Essay Example
How does language reveal the social masks of the protagonists in William Shakespeare’s Hamlet and Luigi Pirandello’s The Late Mattia Pascal?HL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Excellent
A.2Research question focus and appropriateness
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness and effectiveness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student communicates a clear comparative topic from the outset and keeps the essay anchored to the relationship between language, humour, and social masks.
The student's research question is specific enough to sustain a focused literary investigation and remains connected to the discussion throughout.
The student uses a relevant mix of primary and secondary material, and they show an effort to build a conceptual framework rather than listing sources.
The method is present but not always explicit, so the reader is left to infer how the scholarship is being used in the argument.
The wording of the inquiry is broader than the analysis that follows, especially where the essay narrows into humour and verbal performance.
Some framing claims are too general, which makes the line of investigation feel less precise than it could be.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Knowledge of topic and sources
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student demonstrates secure understanding of both literary works and their central identity conflicts.
The student's references to textual detail are generally relevant and show that they are using the texts analytically rather than just summarizing them.
The student handles a range of literary terminology with mostly accurate intent, and many terms are tied to interpretive claims.
Some contextual claims are too broad or reductive, which weakens the precision of the student's knowledge.
At times, terminology is applied a little mechanically or with less precision than the passage deserves.
Secondary material is sometimes mentioned more than fully integrated, so the depth of the student's understanding is not always fully visible.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.