To what extent has the portrayal of Cockney and working-class identity changed in EastEnders from the 1980s to the 2020s?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Excellent
A.2Research question focus and appropriateness
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness and effectiveness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- The student stated a clear comparative research question that stayed visible throughout the essay.
- The student established a relevant topic and used theory to connect language, class, and representation.
- The student showed a mostly purposeful method with a relevant mix of primary and secondary material.
- The student kept the investigation focused enough to sustain a coherent line of argument.
- The student's sampling choices are not always explained in enough detail to make the comparison fully convincing.
- The method becomes less systematic when the student moves from one episode or scene to wider claims.
- At times the topic broadens too far and loses precision.
- Some scene-selection choices are asserted rather than justified.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Knowledge of topic and sources
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
- The student demonstrates solid knowledge of Cockney, Multicultural London English, and EastEnders as a media text.
- The student uses a good range of subject-specific terminology with reasonable accuracy.
- The student connects linguistic features to social and cultural meaning rather than using labels in isolation.
- The student shows awareness of how class, identity, and representation interact in the text.
- Some terminology is not always distinguished carefully enough, especially where slang, dialect, and register overlap.
- A few claims about social meaning are more confident than the evidence supports.
- The application of conceptual ideas is not always consistent across the essay.
- The analysis would be stronger if the student defined and used key terms more precisely throughout.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.