Report an issue
English A Lang & Lit Extended Essay Exemplar: Kendrick Lamar’s… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB English A Lang & Lit SL Extended Essay Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Kendrick Lamar’s Exploration of Racial Injustice in To Pimp a Butterfly
SL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Verified
Criteria A: Focus and Method
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
A.1
Topic communication and clarity
Excellent
A.2
Research question focus and appropriateness
Excellent
A.3
Methodology completeness and effectiveness
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student's investigation is clearly focused and the line of inquiry stays connected to the chosen tracks throughout.
The student communicates the purpose of the essay effectively and the topic is consistently framed in a purposeful way.
The student's selection of methods shows clear intent, especially the use of textual analysis alongside theoretical lenses.
The method is still broader than it needs to be, so some parts of the inquiry feel less controlled than others.
The student needs to explain more clearly how each theoretical lens is being used in practice rather than simply naming them.
The chosen scope would be stronger if the student prioritized a smaller set of techniques and applied them more systematically.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
B.1
Knowledge of topic and sources
Good
B.2
Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student shows secure understanding of the songs, their themes, and the wider cultural context behind them.
The student uses relevant subject-specific terminology with generally accurate control.
The student often connects terminology to meaning rather than listing terms in isolation.
Some contextual claims are inaccurate or not sufficiently verified, which weakens confidence in parts of the discussion.
A few terms and concepts are used too broadly, so the distinctions between lyric, persona, speaker, and performer are sometimes blurred.
The student's source base is uneven, so the authority of some knowledge claims is limited.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
C.1
Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2
Analysis depth and effectiveness
Moderate
C.3
Discussion and evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Pro
View Full Rubric
D.1
Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2
Layout and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.