English A Lang & Lit Extended Essay Exemplar: How does the… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB English A Lang & Lit SL Extended Essay Example
How does the recreation of the book Emma by Jane Austen into the movie
Clueless represent how female roles have changed from 1815 to 1995 through the depiction of Emma/Cher and Harriet/Tai?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and clarity
Good
A.2Research question focus and appropriateness
Good
A.3Methodology completeness and effectiveness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student maintains a clear comparative focus on Emma and Clueless throughout the investigation.
The student's use of both primary texts is consistent, and they bring in quotations, timestamps, and visual evidence to support their points.
The essay is clearly organized, so the reader can follow the line of argument easily.
The research question is too broad for the evidence the student uses, which makes some claims feel historically overextended.
The method is not stated explicitly, so the reader is left to infer how the student selected and compared evidence.
Some comparisons would be stronger if they focused more precisely on adaptation choices and character agency rather than broad social change.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Knowledge of topic and sources
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student demonstrates sound knowledge of the plots and central character relationships in both works.
The student uses appropriate subject terminology such as dialogue, tone, camera angle, costume, and facial expression.
The student generally understands how the film adaptation builds meaning through visual and auditory choices as well as through plot.
Some historical and social claims are simplified and need more careful qualification.
A few terms are used in ways that are not fully precise or analytically controlled.
The student's secondary-source knowledge is not yet integrated deeply enough to create a fully sustained scholarly understanding.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Poor
C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Excellent
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.