English A Lang & Lit Extended Essay Exemplar: How do Flaubert in… | RevisionDojo

Loading document preview...

IB English A Lang & Lit SL Extended Essay Example

How do Flaubert in 'Madame Bovary' and Fitzgerald in 'The Great Gatsby' use narrative perspective and symbolic patterns to reveal self-destruction in the romantic idealism through Emma Bovary and Jay Gatsby within their respective social contexts?SL

Official IB Result

IB Grade: B

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic communication and clarity

Excellent

A.2Research question focus and appropriateness

Good

A.3Methodology completeness and effectiveness

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

The student establishes a clear comparative purpose from the start by linking the two novels, the protagonists, and the central line of enquiry.
The student's discussion stays mostly on topic and uses relevant textual moments to support the investigation.
The student shows an appropriate range of literary methods, including close reference to scenes, symbols, and narrative choices.

The guiding question is too crowded with multiple aims, which makes the investigation less sharply controlled than it could be.
The methodology is mostly implicit; the student uses relevant material, but they do not clearly explain why particular scenes or sources were chosen.
Some contextual material is broader than necessary, which slightly weakens the precision of the focus.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Knowledge of topic and sources

Good

B.2Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

The student demonstrates solid knowledge of both novels and selects key episodes and images that are highly relevant to their argument.
The student uses a wide range of literary terminology accurately in many places, including terms connected to narration, symbolism, realism, and modernism.
The student's discussion usually shows that they understand how form and meaning interact in the texts.

Some narrative and technical claims are imprecise, especially where narrator, focalization, and authorial stance are blurred.
A few device identifications are inaccurate, which weakens the authority of otherwise strong analysis.
The use of sources and editions is not fully controlled, which limits how effectively the evidence is handled.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

8/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness

Moderate

C.3Discussion and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

2/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Structure appropriateness

Moderate

D.2Layout and formatting

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Loading scores...

Official IB Result

IB Grade: B

Criteria A: Focus and Method

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

A.1Topic communication and clarity

Excellent

A.2Research question focus and appropriateness

Good

A.3Methodology completeness and effectiveness

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

The student establishes a clear comparative purpose from the start by linking the two novels, the protagonists, and the central line of enquiry.
The student's discussion stays mostly on topic and uses relevant textual moments to support the investigation.
The student shows an appropriate range of literary methods, including close reference to scenes, symbols, and narrative choices.

The guiding question is too crowded with multiple aims, which makes the investigation less sharply controlled than it could be.
The methodology is mostly implicit; the student uses relevant material, but they do not clearly explain why particular scenes or sources were chosen.
Some contextual material is broader than necessary, which slightly weakens the precision of the focus.

Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding

4/6

Criteria StrandsPro

B.1Knowledge of topic and sources

Good

B.2Use of terminology and concepts

Good

Criteria Feedback

The student demonstrates solid knowledge of both novels and selects key episodes and images that are highly relevant to their argument.
The student uses a wide range of literary terminology accurately in many places, including terms connected to narration, symbolism, realism, and modernism.
The student's discussion usually shows that they understand how form and meaning interact in the texts.

Some narrative and technical claims are imprecise, especially where narrator, focalization, and authorial stance are blurred.
A few device identifications are inaccurate, which weakens the authority of otherwise strong analysis.
The use of sources and editions is not fully controlled, which limits how effectively the evidence is handled.

Criteria C: Critical Thinking

8/12

Criteria StrandsPro

C.1Research quality and relevance

Moderate

C.2Analysis depth and effectiveness

Moderate

C.3Discussion and evaluation

Moderate

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.

Criteria D: Presentation

2/4

Criteria StrandsPro

D.1Structure appropriateness

Moderate

D.2Layout and formatting

Good

Criteria Feedback

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.

Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.