Economics Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent have Kazakhstan’s… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Economics SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent have Kazakhstan’s taxation policies reduced the negative consumption externality associated with cigarettes?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Excellent
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You state a clear, focused research question and keep returning to it throughout the investigation.
You communicate a strong Economics topic with a clear country, policy area, and time frame.
You select a generally relevant mix of primary and secondary methods, including your own survey and official statistics.
Your method would be stronger if you explained your sampling and survey design in more detail.
The wording of the question is slightly broader than the evidence you actually analyze.
Some of the source selection could be more tightly justified, especially where local news is used for quantitative claims.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application and relevance of source material
Moderate
B.2Knowledge of topic/discipline
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You show secure understanding of key Economics ideas such as negative externalities, indirect taxation, affordability, and price elasticity.
You use terminology mostly accurately and in ways that fit the topic.
You connect theory to the Kazakhstan context in a way that makes the essay relevant and coherent.
Some important concepts need more precision, especially around internalization and the difference between reducing consumption and reducing external costs.
A few factual and causal claims are stated too strongly for the evidence provided.
Some source application is weakened by limited scrutiny of whether different data points are measuring the same thing.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality and relevance
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.