Economics Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent has the government… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Economics SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent has the government subsidy “Mój Prąd” on micro solar installations increased the demand for electric vehicles sold in Poland since 2019?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student poses a specific, time-bound question that is clearly linked to a real policy and a measurable market outcome.
The student's introduction gives the investigation a clear purpose and shows that they understand the broader economic context.
The student uses a mix of source types, which shows some deliberate attempt to build a multi-faceted investigation.
The student's focus shifts between EV demand, EV registrations, ownership, and market growth, which weakens precision.
The method is not developed enough to show how the evidence is being compared in a systematic way.
The investigation does not fully explain how it would isolate the effect of the subsidy from other influences such as competing policies and market trends.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application and relevance of source material
Moderate
B.2Knowledge of topic/discipline
Good
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student shows a clear understanding of key microeconomic ideas such as subsidies, complements, demand, and consumer preferences.
The student applies economic theory to the case in a way that is generally relevant and meaningful.
The student's use of terminology is mostly accurate and helps support the line of argument.
Some concepts are not used with full precision, especially the distinction between demand and quantity demanded.
The discussion sometimes moves from theory to conclusion too quickly without enough support from the sources.
Several claims rely on evidence that is suggestive rather than directly tied to the households affected by the policy.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.