Economics Extended Essay Exemplar: How does peer influence through… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Economics SL Extended Essay Example
How does peer influence through herd mentality compare with AI-driven recommendations in shaping investment decisions on eToro?SL
Loading scores...
D
Official IB Result
IB Grade: D
Criteria A: Focus and Method
2/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Moderate
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Moderate
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student states a clear research question anchored to a specific platform and comparison.
The student's topic is recognizable and relevant to Economics, with an appropriate behavioural focus.
The student shows an attempt to build a method using multiple source types and some awareness of source limitations.
The comparison is not operationalized, so the essay does not define exactly how the two influences will be measured or compared.
The structure broadens beyond the stated question, which weakens the central focus.
The methodology is too generic and does not explain how sources were selected, evaluated, or used to test the question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application and relevance of source material
Poor
B.2Knowledge of topic/discipline
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Poor
Criteria Feedback
The student shows clear familiarity with core behavioural and economic ideas such as herd behaviour, loss aversion, asymmetric information, and bounded rationality.
The student uses a range of source material to support definitions and basic explanation.
The student demonstrates some understanding of both the benefits and risks of copying behaviour and AI-assisted investing.
Much of the source material is generic or explanatory rather than directly tied to eToro users, features, or outcomes.
Several claims about the platform are not supported with platform-specific evidence.
Some concepts are introduced accurately but applied too broadly or imprecisely in the analysis.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
4/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria E: Engagement (Reflection)
Criteria StrandsPro
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.