How did the COVID-19 pandemic alter cigarette consumption within the New Zealand cigarette market, between 2019 and 2024?SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student's investigation is clearly framed around a specific country and time period, which gives the essay a real sense of direction.
The student generally stays connected to the central question through the discussion of smoking trends, lockdown conditions, health concerns, and policy influences.
The student chose an appropriate broad method for an economics investigation by using secondary evidence and trend comparison.
The causal claim is broader than the evidence can securely support, because the discussion cannot fully separate COVID-19 from other major influences.
The question sometimes becomes diluted by moving between smoking prevalence, cigarette consumption, public perception, and welfare effects.
The method would be stronger if the student explained more clearly why each data source was selected and how each one answers the question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application and relevance of source material
Moderate
B.2Knowledge of topic/discipline
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student uses a relevant range of source material, including New Zealand smoking data, policy sources, and academic/public-health evidence.
The student shows a sound understanding of key economics ideas such as demerit goods, externalities, demand, welfare loss, and policy intervention.
The student makes a genuine effort to connect the evidence to economic interpretation rather than simply describing the topic.
Some evidence is applied too loosely or without enough justification, especially when moving from general trends to conclusions about smoking behaviour.
Several economic terms and ideas are used accurately in places, but there are also important conceptual slips that weaken the precision of the explanation.
At times the student treats inference as fact, especially when discussing public perception and subgroup differences.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.