Economics Extended Essay Exemplar: Germany’s Renewable Energy Act | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Economics SL Extended Essay Example
Assessing the Impact of Germany’s Renewable Energy Act in Promoting Renewable EnergySL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and appropriateness
Good
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Good
A.3Methodology completeness and appropriateness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student chose a clear economics topic with a defined country, policy, outcome area and time frame.
The student's research question gives the essay a recognisable direction and keeps the investigation anchored to one policy.
The student used a range of relevant sources and attempted to combine official data with policy and market evidence.
The student's question is still too broad because success is not defined by specific indicators.
The discussion moves beyond the stated focus into several wider issues, which weakens control of the investigation.
The student's method does not clearly show how they are isolating the effect of EEG 2021 from major external shocks and later policy changes.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application and relevance of source material
Moderate
B.2Knowledge of topic/discipline
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student shows clear knowledge of relevant economic ideas such as subsidies, market failure, price effects and externalities.
The student uses several key terms appropriately and connects them to the policy discussion.
The student includes policy-specific details that help show how the EEG works in practice.
Some source use is descriptive rather than critical, so evidence is not always applied with enough precision.
There are a few conceptual and terminology errors that reduce reliability.
At points the student blurs important distinctions, such as between different kinds of energy data or between broad policy effects and the specific mechanism being studied.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality and relevance
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.