How has the Qomek cross-platform transformed patient-doctor interactions in Astana, Kazakhstan as a system which impacts on the efficiency of healthcare services?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- You communicate a locally grounded topic clearly and keep the investigation centred on Qomek in Astana.
- You show purposeful source selection by combining interviews, a survey, direct platform observation, and secondary literature.
- You explain the basic context of the platform and its relevance to patient access and booking fairly well.
- Some parts become descriptive or speculative instead of staying tightly tied to the evidence you can actually support.
- The research focus is broader than it needs to be, so the enquiry is not fully sharpened around one clear set of indicators.
- Your method description would be stronger if you explained the interview and survey design and analysis in more detail.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- You use a range of relevant sources and connect several of them to the platform and the local healthcare context.
- You apply important terminology such as telemedicine, digital divide, privacy, accessibility, and stakeholder with generally sound meaning.
- You make a useful comparison between the platform’s visible functions and broader telemedicine ideas.
- Some of the evidence is more general telemedicine material than direct evidence about Qomek or Astana.
- A few claims are supported too loosely, especially where you move from source material into speculation.
- Some concepts are introduced without being developed consistently enough to shape the argument throughout the report.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research analysis
Poor
C.2Discussion and evaluation
Poor
C.3Argument development
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.