Design Technology (DT) Extended Essay Example: To what extent are… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Design Technology (DT) SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent are GWSs a sustainable alternative to traditional wastewater disposal?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
A.2Research question clarity and focus
Moderate
A.3Methodology appropriateness and completeness
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student communicates a worthwhile topic clearly and sustains a coherent line of inquiry from greywater reuse to a site-specific design proposal.
The student's research question stays connected to the main investigation, and the final conclusion returns to it directly.
The student selected several relevant methods, including an expert interview, a site visit, case-study research, and contextual calculations.
The student's research question is still broader than it needs to be, especially in how it uses terms like sustainability and effectiveness.
The method would be stronger if the student stated their interview focus, source-selection process, and comparison criteria more explicitly.
Some of the narrowing to the Singapore site happens later in the report rather than being embedded in the original framing.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Subject knowledge and source application
Good
B.2Use of terminology and concepts
Good
Criteria Feedback
The student shows good subject knowledge across greywater treatment, water reuse, membrane processes, disinfection, and centralized wastewater systems.
The student uses technical vocabulary confidently and usually accurately, which helps the report sound informed and specific.
The student connects source material to the proposed design in a way that shows understanding of how the systems work in practice.
Some important claims and numerical inputs are not traceable enough in the report body, which weakens the reliability of the student's evidence use.
A few technical explanations need more precision, especially where process chemistry or treatment outcomes are described too confidently.
The student sometimes relies on source material without enough discussion of bias, transferability, or local applicability.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
10/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research relevance and application
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth and conclusions
Moderate
C.3Discussion and evaluation quality
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
4/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Excellent
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.