Computer Science (CS) Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent can… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Computer Science (CS) SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent can different machine learning models predict UFC fight results using publicly available data?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic Communication
Excellent
A.2Research Question
Excellent
A.3Methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
Your investigation has a clear, well-bounded topic and the comparison of three named models gives the report a strong sense of purpose.
You explain the dataset and the modelling steps with enough clarity that the reader can follow how the prediction task was set up.
You show awareness of feature leakage and the need to use pre-fight information, which strengthens the overall design of the study.
The research question would be stronger if you defined in advance what would count as meaningful predictive success.
Some parts of the method still leave room for uncertainty about whether the predictors were fully valid for a true pre-fight prediction task.
The preprocessing and validation process needed to be more tightly controlled and explained.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Subject Knowledge
Good
B.2Use of Terminology
Good
Criteria Feedback
You use a good range of machine-learning terminology accurately, including key ideas such as data leakage, cross-validation, precision, recall, and F1 score.
You show sound understanding of supervised classification and explain why accuracy alone is not always enough.
Your explanations are generally accessible while still using appropriate technical vocabulary.
A few technical explanations are simplified or occasionally imprecise, especially where model details and hyperparameters are discussed.
Some parts of the discussion do not stay fully aligned with the final model setup, which weakens precision.
The source base leans more toward general explanations than deeper technical or subject-specific evidence.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research Application
Moderate
C.2Analysis
Poor
C.3Discussion and Evaluation
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure
Excellent
D.2Layout
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.