Report an issue
Chemistry Extended Essay Exemplar: Effect of heating on vegetable oils | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
View file
Back
IB Chemistry HL Extended Essay Example
Scores
Rubric
Similar Examples
10
Chat
Effect of heating on vegetable oils
HL
Loading scores...
A
B
C
D
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Verified
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
View Full Rubric
A.1
Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2
Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3
Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You communicate a relevant and purposeful chemistry investigation with a clear real-world context.
Your research question is stated and connected to practical experimental work.
You include a generally appropriate range of methods and apparatus for comparing heated oil samples.
The investigation focus is too broad, combining several oils, heating states, and UV measurements in one question.
The UV-theory section is unfinished, which weakens the clarity of your rationale.
Some methodological choices are not tightly controlled, especially temperature, solvent choice, and variable standardization.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
View Full Rubric
B.1
Application of source material
Moderate
B.2
Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3
Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You show solid basic understanding of oil acidity, free fatty acids, titration, and instrumental measurement.
You use a good range of chemistry terminology and formulae appropriately in many places.
You apply source material to give context and to support the experimental topic.
Some chemical explanations are inaccurate, especially the discussion of acidity and thermal change.
The UV explanation is incomplete, so the theory does not fully support the later interpretation.
Source use is sometimes too general, and the regulatory comparison is not always methodologically secure.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
View Full Rubric
C.1
Research quality
Poor
C.2
Analysis depth
Poor
C.3
Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
View Full Rubric
D.1
Structure appropriateness
Moderate
D.2
Layout considerations
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.