This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Business Management Extended Essay Exemplar: ARK ETF and Portfolio… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Business Management SL Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent should ARK introduce an ETF that includes Harry Markowitz’s Portfolio Selection Theory as a growth strategy?
To what extent should ARK introduce an ETF that includes Harry Markowitz’s Portfolio Selection Theory as a growth strategy?
Loading scores...
B
Overall Score
19/28
Was this exemplar helpful?
Want a report just like this?
Free mini report for your own coursework
Fast feedback on what to improve next
Annotated highlights on your writing
Criteria A: Focus and Method
6/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
Research question formulation and focus
Excellent
Research methodology
Criteria Feedback
Your research question is clearly defined, specific, and kept in view throughout the investigation.
You choose methods and tools that fit the topic and help organise the argument logically.
Your topic is communicated clearly, with the reader able to follow the strategic purpose of the investigation.
The method is described more fully than it is carried out, so the investigation would be stronger with more visible implementation.
The strategic angle could be sharpened further by making the final decision process more concrete.
A few places would benefit from clearer explanation of how each analytical tool directly answers the question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Application of source material
Excellent
Subject knowledge
Excellent
Use of terminology and concepts
Criteria Feedback
You show secure understanding of key finance ideas such as ETFs, diversification, risk, return, variance, covariance, and efficient frontiers.
You use terminology accurately and consistently in a way that supports the argument rather than distracting from it.
Your source material is generally relevant and is applied in a way that matches the purpose of the investigation.
The discussion would be stronger if you linked more of the theory to ARK’s specific business context and decision-making needs.
Some of the knowledge remains more conceptual than demonstrated through your own worked application.
A few claims would benefit from more direct evidence drawn from your analysis rather than from explanation alone.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
7/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
Moderate
Research quality
Moderate
Analysis depth
Moderate
Discussion and evaluation
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
Criteria D: Presentation
1/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
Excellent
Structure appropriateness
Good
Layout and formatting
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Unlock all criteria
Upgrade to PRO to see detailed feedback for all criteria in this exemplar.
