Business Management Extended Essay Exemplar: Nokia Innovation… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Business Management HL Extended Essay Example
To what extent has the lack of innovation, driven by poor market research, contributed to Nokia's failure to grow as a smartphone organization?HL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Good
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Moderate
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student stated a clear, evaluative research question that is consistently linked to the discussion.
The student selected several relevant analytical tools and showed how they relate to the topic of Nokia’s decline.
The student kept the topic recognizable and relevant throughout the investigation.
The question is still broad, with key terms such as growth and innovation not tightly defined.
The causal framing is too predetermined in places, so the investigation sometimes assumes the answer rather than testing it.
The method would be stronger if the student explained why each source and tool was chosen and how it would help answer the question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student demonstrates clear knowledge of Nokia’s smartphone-era challenges and the competitive context around Apple, Android, and Symbian.
The student uses relevant business terminology such as innovation, market research, strategic alliance, and organizational inertia.
The student applies source material to support the discussion of Nokia’s decisions and market position.
Much of the evidence comes from general online summaries rather than stronger business or industry sources.
Some important claims are not supported with specific data, especially where the student discusses market research, consumer preferences, or performance.
A few concepts are applied imprecisely, which weakens the reliability of the explanation.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.