To what extent does the use of Logistics and Specific Web Services affect Amazon’s competitiveness in the market of the Service and Software Industry?SL
Loading scores...
B
Overall Score
19/28
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Moderate
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Poor
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- You state an evaluative research question and keep the investigation anchored to Amazon’s logistics and AWS.
- You use a sensible mix of business tools and financial evidence to build the line of enquiry.
- You show awareness that both qualitative and quantitative evidence are needed.
- You generally connect the topic to relevant business ideas such as competitiveness, differentiation, and cost leadership.
- The scope is too broad and shifts between multiple markets and levels of analysis.
- The question would be stronger if key terms such as competitiveness were defined more precisely.
- The methodology reads more like a list of tools than a justified research design.
- Some source selection and method choices are not fully aligned with the exact question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria Strands
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
- You demonstrate clear knowledge of relevant business concepts such as economies of scale, cost leadership, differentiation, and switching costs.
- You apply several terms accurately in discussing logistics and AWS.
- You make generally relevant use of company and market evidence to support your business points.
- You show an effective grasp of the different strategic roles that logistics and AWS can play.
- Some financial claims are not supported by the evidence provided, especially where company-wide figures are treated as segment-specific.
- A few concepts are stretched beyond what the data can safely prove.
- The source material is sometimes applied too loosely to the conclusion being drawn.
- Terminology is mostly accurate, but not always used with full consistency across the different business contexts.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria Strands
C.1Research quality
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria Strands
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
- Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
- Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
- Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
- Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.