Business Management Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent did… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Business Management SL Extended Essay Example
To what extent did Shein’s ethical practices help regain consumer trust following its exploitation scandals?SL
Loading scores...
A
Official IB Result
IB Grade: A
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Good
A.3Research methodology
Good
Criteria Feedback
You communicate a clear and relevant investigation topic about SHEIN’s ethical controversies and consumer trust.
You keep the research question visible throughout the essay and generally connect the discussion back to it.
You show awareness of appropriate business research approaches and justify using secondary research for a private company.
The question is still too broad because key terms are not defined precisely enough.
Several tools and frameworks are named but not always used in a fully analytical way.
The discussion sometimes expands into related ethical issues without consistently showing how they answer the exact question.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
3/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You demonstrate clear knowledge of relevant business ideas such as CSR, stakeholder impact, brand equity, crisis communication, and supply-chain management.
You generally use terminology accurately and in a way that is understandable to the reader.
You draw on a wide mix of sources that helps build a coherent picture of SHEIN’s business and ethical context.
Some concepts are applied too loosely or inconsistently, especially where trust, loyalty, awareness, and download trends are treated as if they were the same thing.
A few business models and theories are introduced more confidently than they are explained or supported.
Source application is uneven, with some evidence used well and other evidence used mainly as background facts rather than as carefully analysed material.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
12/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Moderate
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
3/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Good
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.