Business Management Extended Essay Exemplar: To what extent are… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Business Management HL Extended Essay Example
To what extent are promotional pricing strategies effective in maintaining brand loyalty for PZ Cussons amidst competition within the Kenyan market?HL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
5/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Excellent
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Excellent
A.3Research methodology
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student states a clear, business-focused research question and keeps the investigation anchored to a specific company and market.
The student's topic stays relevant to the question for most of the report, especially when distinguishing short-term sales effects from longer-term loyalty.
The student selects appropriate business tools and sources for the investigation and gives some justification for their use.
The method needs more detail about how the primary research was carried out and why the sample can be trusted.
Some parts of the discussion drift toward pricing and competition more generally rather than staying tightly focused on loyalty.
The research design would be stronger if the student explained the exact survey and interview procedures more transparently.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
The student demonstrates a clear understanding of promotional pricing, brand loyalty, and related concepts such as buyer power, brand equity, and price elasticity.
The student uses source material that is mostly relevant to the case and often connects theory to the PZ Cussons context.
The student's terminology is generally accurate and helps make the argument understandable.
Some concepts are not applied with full precision, especially where pricing strategies are classified too broadly or asserted without enough support.
Several important claims are not backed by sufficiently traceable evidence, which weakens the strength of the student's source application.
The student's use of terminology is mostly accurate, but some explanations would benefit from tighter definitions and clearer justification.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
8/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Moderate
D.2Layout and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.