Business Management Extended Essay Exemplar: Football Funding and… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Business Management SL Extended Essay Example
This was WORLD STUDIES BUSINESS ECON.
RQ: To what extent does the funding for football affect other sports?SL
Loading scores...
B
Official IB Result
IB Grade: B
Criteria A: Focus and Method
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
A.1Topic communication and explanation
Moderate
A.2Research question formulation and focus
Poor
A.3Research methodology
Poor
Criteria Feedback
You state a clear research question and keep returning to the idea of comparison across sports.
You show an organized investigative approach with relevant secondary sources and a recognisable method.
You communicate the topic with enough clarity that the reader can follow the main line of inquiry.
Your question is still quite broad because key terms such as funding are not tightly defined.
The method is described, but it is not yet systematic enough in how sources are chosen and compared.
The discussion sometimes shifts between different meanings of football funding, which weakens focus.
Criteria B: Knowledge and Understanding
4/6
0
3
6
Criteria StrandsPro
B.1Application of source material
Moderate
B.2Subject knowledge
Moderate
B.3Use of terminology and concepts
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
You show clear understanding of important economic ideas linked to sport, such as revenue streams, broadcasting rights, sponsorship, and market structure.
You use terminology that is often relevant and purposeful rather than purely decorative.
You apply source material to a recognisable comparative context involving football, rugby, and cricket.
Some of your knowledge is not applied with enough precision, especially where commercial income and public funding are treated too similarly.
Several terms and classifications need tighter justification so the economics remains accurate and consistent.
At times, the evidence is used to support broad claims without enough care over what exactly the figures prove.
Criteria C: Critical Thinking
9/12
0
6
12
Criteria StrandsPro
C.1Research quality
Poor
C.2Analysis depth
Poor
C.3Discussion and evaluation
Poor
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Criteria D: Presentation
2/4
0
2
4
Criteria StrandsPro
D.1Structure appropriateness
Good
D.2Layout and formatting
Moderate
Criteria Feedback
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur.
Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.