An Experiment to Investigate the Correlation Between Articulatory Suppression and the Ability to Recall a Sequence of Letters
IA
6
SL
This site uses cookie tracking technologies. Learn more in our Cookie Policy.
Browse top scoring exemplars of IB Psychology IA with SL/HL samples, examiner-style feedback, criteria breakdowns, and real student Internal Assessment exemplars.
The grader works in two modes:
The IB Psychology IA is assessed across four criteria, totalling 22 marks:
| Mark Band | What it means | Evidence you must show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Excellent introduction | Aim stated and relevance explained; Theory described and link to investigation explained; Variables stated and operationalized in hypothesis |
| 3–4 | Adequate introduction | Aim stated and relevance identified but not explained; Theory described but link to investigation not explained; Variables correctly stated but not operationalized |
| 1–2 | Limited introduction | Aim stated but relevance not identified; Theory identified but description incomplete/errors; Hypothesis stated but variables not correctly identified |
| 0 | No standard reached | Does not meet basic descriptors |
| Mark Band | What it means | Evidence you must show |
|---|---|---|
| 3–4 | Thorough exploration | Research design explained; Sampling technique explained; Choice of participants explained; Controlled variables explained; Choice of materials explained |
| 1–2 | Basic exploration | Research design described; Sampling technique described; Participant characteristics described; Controlled variables described; Materials described |
| 0 | No standard reached | Does not meet basic descriptors |
| Mark Band | What it means | Evidence you must show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Excellent analysis | Descriptive and inferential statistics appropriately and accurately applied; Graph correctly presented and addresses hypothesis; Statistical findings interpreted and linked to hypothesis |
| 3–4 | Adequate analysis | Appropriate statistics applied but with errors; Graph addresses hypothesis but contains errors; Statistical findings stated but not interpreted or not linked to hypothesis |
| 1–2 | Limited analysis | Only descriptive or inferential statistics applied; Correct graphing technique but graph doesn't address hypothesis; No clear statement of findings |
| 0 | No standard reached | Does not meet basic descriptors |
| Mark Band | What it means | Evidence you must show |
|---|---|---|
| 5–6 | Excellent evaluation | Findings discussed with reference to background theory; Strengths/limitations stated and explained and relevant to investigation; Modifications explicitly linked to limitations and fully justified |
| 3–4 | Good evaluation | Findings described with reference to background theory; Strengths/limitations stated and described and relevant to investigation; Modifications described but not explicitly linked to limitations |
| 1–2 | Limited evaluation | Findings described without reference to background theory; Strengths/limitations stated but not directly relevant to hypothesis; Modifications stated |
| 0 | No standard reached | Does not meet basic descriptors |
If you're between bands, focus on Criterion III (C, Analysis) and Criterion IV (D, Evaluation) - they offer the biggest impact for improvement.
IB Psychology IA grade boundaries are consistent but can vary slightly by session:
| IB Grade | Typical Mark Range | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 19-22 | 86-100% |
| 6 | 16-18 | 73-82% |
| 5 | 13-15 | 59-68% |
| 4 | 10-12 | 45-55% |
| 3 | 7-9 | 32-41% |
And quick fixes:
| 2 | 4-6 | 18-27% |
| 1 | 0-3 | 0-14% |
Get annotated suggestions, strengths, and actionable feedback for your work.
View your feedback in the context of the subject rubric and broken down by criteria strands.
All files are deleted within 48 hours. We do not train on your data.