Research question embedded in a clear, specific agronomic context with quantitative justification.
Methodological considerations are systematically explained, including sample size and variable control.
Detailed step-by-step procedure with volumes, masses and apparatus tolerances ensures reproducibility.
Slight omissions in contextual specificity (e.g., local relevance of radish cultivation).
Minor formatting inconsistencies in control-variables table alignment.
Omission of explicit mass values for some NaCl solution preparations.
Data tables, graphs and statistical outputs are clearly laid out with correct units, labels and legends.
Appropriate statistical analyses (averages, SD, R², ANOVA) are correctly performed and interpreted.
Separation of raw and processed data enhances clarity and interpretation.
No propagation of uncertainties through to final results; counting error for germination rate is ignored.
Minor formatting glitches in tables and inconsistent significant figures.
Raw data tables contain blanks/overlines that obscure some values.
Conclusion directly answers the research question and is backed by quantitative (R², ANOVA) evidence.
Claims are consistent with both germination rate and radicle length data.
Comparison to the accepted scientific context is relevant but not sufficiently deep or critical.
Minor over-interpretation of ‘partial alleviation’ without further statistical support.
Specific methodological weaknesses are identified and their impact on variance and reliability is explained.
Improvements proposed are realistic, linked to identified limitations, and include explanatory rationale.
No clear prioritization of which limitation has the greatest impact.
Some suggested improvements lack detailed experimental implementation plans.
