IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar
Teaching Morals Through Storytelling: Creating a Children’s Book for Orphanage Readers
7
Student Score
Loading scores...
Overall Feedback
Criteria A: Applying skills
Detailed explanation of research skills application is supported by authentic evidence and citations.
Use of visuals—screenshots of sources and an interview photograph—adds credibility and depth to your reflection on skill use.
A concise summary of ATL skills demonstrates thoughtful consideration of how these skills supported your learning goal.
The self-management section would benefit from inclusion of specific time logs or milestones to strengthen evidence of effective planning.
Communication skills reflection is thorough but verbose; it lacks concise examples showing direct impact on product quality.
Thinking skills reflection is not clearly integrated with product examples, reducing coherence between skills applied and outcomes achieved.
Criteria B: Planning
The learning goal is clearly articulated and connected to personal experience, providing strong motivation and focus.
A conceptual map effectively organizes personal interests and the learning goal, enhancing clarity of the planning rationale.
The product goal is concise and aligns with collaboration and creativity skill development, creating coherent planning objectives.
The success criteria table contains multiple incomplete and repetitive entries, reducing measurability and focus.
The action plan lacks specification of required resources and a clear sequencing of tasks, which may hinder feasibility and time management.
Detailed aesthetic tasks are not grouped under clear subheadings, making the plan harder to navigate and implement.
Criteria C: Reflecting
The success evaluation table systematically aligns each criterion with outcomes, providing clear evidence of evaluation.
Reflections on personal growth and creativity are insightful, with effective use of survey data to demonstrate impact.
Audience reflection highlights cultural relevance, showing awareness of the target reader and engagement strategies.
Discussion of digital tool selection (e.g., iPad, software) is missing, leaving a gap in materials reflection.
The introduction to the reflection section lacks an outline of its structure, which could guide the reader through your evaluation.
The conclusion summarizes growth but does not propose specific next steps or future goals, limiting forward-looking reflection.