IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Example: Teaching… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Personal Project (MYP) SL External Assessment Example
Teaching Morals Through Storytelling: Creating a Children’s Book for Orphanage ReadersSL
7
Student Score
Loading scores...
Criteria A: Planning
0
4
8
Criteria Feedback
Clear personal purpose: the report establishes a starting point and explains why the project matters personally, giving the learning goal genuine relevance.
Thoughtful sequencing of the plan: the inclusion of research, drafting, and illustration stages shows forward thinking and an awareness of how the product would be created.
Some evidence of measurable thinking: the project already includes several success criteria and shows an attempt to define what completion should look like.
The learning goal is too broad to be judged fully and would benefit from being narrowed to a smaller number of specific, measurable skills or techniques.
Success criteria need to be more precise and independent: some are combined or too general, making it difficult to assess each one clearly.
The link between planned activities and product improvement is not always explicit: the plan would be stronger if each stage showed how the learning directly changed the storybook.
1.1·Strength
Page 1• Click to view
The student clearly establishes a personal starting point and connects it to the value of their project. This gives their report purpose and helps explain why the learning goal matters to them.
1.2·Weakness
Page 1• Click to view
The student's learning goal is relevant, but it is too broad to be fully measurable. They should narrow it to a few specific skills or techniques so success can be judged more clearly.
1.3·Question
Page 2• Click to view
How will the student know, in practical terms, that this product goal has been fully achieved? They could consider what evidence would show the book was completed, published, and successfully made available to the intended audience.
1.4·Suggestion
Page 2• Click to view
The student should revise their success criteria so each one is specific and measurable. For example, they should define what counts as effective vocabulary, a clear moral, or appropriate illustration quality.
1.5·Suggestion
Page 3• Click to view
The student's criteria would be stronger if each one stayed separate and measurable. They should split combined criteria like cost and time into clearer statements so each can be evaluated independently.
1.6·Strength
Page 4• Click to view
The student's plan includes concrete stages of research, drafting, and illustration. That sequencing shows they were thinking ahead about how the product would actually be created.
1.7·Weakness
Page 4• Click to view
Some plan entries describe what the student learned, but not how that learning changed the next step in their product. They should make the link between each activity and a specific improvement to the storybook clearer.
Criteria B: Applying skills
0
4
8
Criteria Feedback
Relevant ATL skills are identified and applied: the response goes beyond naming skills by connecting them to concrete research methods and project work.
Some evidence of impact on the product: the student shows that thinking and communication skills were used in ways that supported decisions and development of the storybook.
The explanation is grounded in the project rather than being purely descriptive, which helps demonstrate genuine skill application.
The explanation is not consistently specific enough about how ATL skills improved the learning outcome or raised the quality of the final product.
Some discussion becomes generic or off-task and does not stay focused on the book or on how the skills affected the work directly.
Effectiveness is underdeveloped: the section would be stronger if each skill included one clear example of what changed because of it.
2.1·Suggestion
Page 5• Click to view
When describing ATL skills, the student should add one short example of effectiveness for each skill. They should show not only what they did, but how it helped them stay on track or improve the product.
2.2·Strength
Page 5• Click to view
The student identifies relevant ATL skills and supports them with concrete research methods. This is much stronger than simply naming the skills because it shows how they were used.
2.3·Weakness
Page 5• Click to view
The student explains what they found, but not enough about how those findings improved their own learning outcome. They should focus more on how the research changed their decisions or strengthened their final product.
2.4·Question
Page 6• Click to view
What specific evidence shows that the student's time management improved the product quality or helped them meet deadlines more effectively? They should try to include one concrete example rather than a general statement.
2.5·Suggestion
Page 7• Click to view
The student would improve this strand by showing exactly how each thinking skill changed the storybook itself. For example, they should explain how one specific idea, character choice, or revision improved the final quality.
2.6·Weakness
Page 7• Click to view
This section becomes generic here and does not stay focused on the student's project. They should remove unrelated discussion and keep the explanation tied directly to how communication helped them gather useful information for the book.
Criteria C: Reflecting
Criteria Feedback
Direct criterion-based evaluation: the product is assessed against the success criteria rather than only described, which is a strong reflection practice.
Evidence is drawn from the finished storybook: this helps make the evaluation more credible and shows an attempt to support judgments with specific examples.
The student shows adaptability by reflecting on setbacks and responding to them in practical ways.
Some judgments are not fully supported by precise evidence: in places, the reflection states that criteria were met without enough detail to make the conclusion convincing.
Where targets were not fully achieved, the reflection needs deeper analysis of why the shortfall happened and what would be changed next time.
The final evaluation would benefit from stronger synthesis: the most important areas of growth should be identified clearly and backed with concrete examples.