Topic and purpose are communicated accurately and consistently throughout, anchoring the investigation clearly.
The research question is clearly stated, focused on one novel and theme, and is effectively linked to the analysis.
The methodology is outlined with named approaches and both primary and secondary sources, showing an organized plan.
Slight digressions and repetitive phrasing prevent full precision of focus.
Methodology lacks detail on source‐selection processes and search criteria.
Citation formatting and completeness in footnotes are inconsistent, weakening methodological rigour.
Quotations and external criticism are frequently and pertinently applied to support key points.
Subject knowledge of plot, character, symbolism, and historical context is clear, coherent, and well integrated.
Terminology and literary/social‐science concepts are used accurately and consistently throughout.
A few citations are repeated or inaccurately transcribed, and some claims rest on general opinion rather than rigorous evidence.
Minor superficial generalizations appear without deeper critical scrutiny.
Primary and secondary research consistently relate to the research question, showing excellent relevance.
The argument is coherently structured, with a clear stance on the impact of ambition on meaning.
The conclusion effectively synthesizes key insights and reinforces the investigative focus.
Analytical depth is uneven—some sections remain descriptive or assertive rather than deeply interrogated.
Alternate interpretations and counter‐arguments are only lightly acknowledged, limiting evaluative rigor.
Structure follows the expected EE format, with clear headings, introduction, chapters, and conclusion.
Layout elements such as title page, word count, and pagination are present and correctly applied.
The overall organization supports navigability and reader comprehension.
Table of contents omits some page numbers and shows inconsistent indentation.
Miscoded tags () and inconsistent footnote formatting detract slightly from professionalism.