IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

Demonstrated excellent self-directed learning by researching and selecting targeted resources to improve technique.

Developed a coherent periodization strategy that shows understanding of loading and deloading principles aligned with strength objectives.

Applied skills are not explicitly linked to performance outcomes—there is little evidence showing how each ATL skill drove specific improvements.

Lack of data visualizations or summarized trend charts from the training log reduces the ability to illustrate progress patterns.

Periodization details (exact loading/deloading durations) and pre-/post-session technique analyses are undefined, limiting rigor and clarity.

Clear, measurable strength targets (80 kg press, 150 kg deadlift) provide a solid foundation for tracking progress.

A compelling explanation of personal growth and interest in strength training that links motivation directly to the learning goal.

Success criteria lack specific timelines and milestones (e.g., testing schedule every four weeks) to make progress measurable and time-bound.

Missing technique checklist and safety protocols (equipment lists, spotting procedures) reduce clarity around required resources and risk management.

Workout sequencing is underdeveloped; the push–pull–leg split would benefit from a mapped-out weekly schedule and defined session goals.

Insightful and candid reflection on personal persistence, safety considerations, and the learning process.

A thorough narrative that captures self-assessment and lessons learned during the training cycle.

Evaluation lacks quantitative comparison between baseline and current performance (e.g., initial vs. final 1RM).

Forward-looking reflections are optimistic but not grounded in SMART objectives to guide the next cycle.

No clear analysis of gaps between expected and actual outcomes against each success criterion, weakening depth of evaluation.