IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

You captured expert insights effectively in your interview summary, showing active engagement with professional guidance.

The use of an AOOQQ evaluation framework and Cornell method illustrates strong research and organizational skills.

Your iterative hand-sketches and SketchUp modeling demonstrate creative exploration and technical proficiency.

Connections between expert quotes and actual design adjustments are not explicitly shown.

Examples of how the research framework or modeling exercises directly informed or prevented errors in your final model are missing.

The design and material evaluation tables are well-structured but need clear links to your final product choices and improvements.

Your learning goal comprehensively integrates evaluation of architectural strategies and practical modeling objectives, demonstrating a clear vision for both theoretical and hands-on outcomes.

The action plan lacks a detailed sequence of tasks, resource allocations and buffer times to ensure feasibility.

Success criteria are not fully measurable; testing methods are too general and require quantifiable protocols (e.g. °C reduction, flow-rate thresholds).

The 13-week timeline needs clearer milestones and feasibility checks to guard against delays in interviews or material procurement.

Your reflection shows strong self-awareness, particularly regarding the limits of online research and the value of expert interviews.

Incorporating survey data to gauge aesthetic reception indicates thoughtful consideration of audience perspective.

Your candid discussion of time management challenges highlights growing maturity in self-regulation.

You do not systematically map each success criterion to specific evidence from testing or feedback.

The overall evaluation is dense and would benefit from a concise summary table indicating met, partially met or unmet criteria.

Discussion of survey data lacks critique of sampling biases and concrete steps for future improvement.