IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

The data organization table demonstrates strong self-management and effective integration of research findings.

The research question table omits detailed methods for data collection, reducing clarity on how insights will be gathered.

Nutrition content sections lack complete citations beside each macro explanation, affecting the credibility of information.

Calculations (e.g., percentage error) are presented without clear mathematical formatting, hindering readability.

The ATL strategy table names self-management methods but does not include concrete examples of when they were applied.

Process logs describe activities but do not link actions to their impact on the project or outline next steps.

The Gantt chart provides a clear visualization of task sequencing and duration, supporting effective time management.

Specification table lacks details on required resources and sequencing, making the plan less actionable.

Learning goal is clear but missing measurable success criteria to gauge progress objectively.

Personal interest is described but not sufficiently linked with concrete examples to justify goal choices.

Several task deadlines precede realistic completion dates, indicating a need to adjust scheduling dependencies.

Product goals are outlined qualitatively but lack quantifiable targets (e.g., number of restaurants, timeframe) to focus development.

User-testing reflections effectively identify key usability issues and demonstrate responsive iteration to enhance user experience.

Self-assessment against success criteria is thorough, showing engagement with evaluative processes.

Logo iteration logs lack defined evaluation metrics, making it unclear how design choices were judged.

Process reflections document troubleshooting but do not link resolutions to success criteria or learning outcomes.

Time-management reflection acknowledges setbacks but omits future strategies to prevent similar delays.

Comparison of Webflow vs Wix UI is insightful but does not address its impact on timeline, functionality, or user experience in detail.

Reflections on ATL skill development lack specific evidence of how the skills grew and influenced outcomes.