IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Example: My Designed… | RevisionDojo
Loading document preview...
IB Personal Project (MYP) SL External Assessment Example
My Designed Grade 10 YearbookSL
6
Student Score
Loading scores...
General feedback
No overall summary is available for this report.
4.1·Strength
Page 1• Click to view
The student states a clear intended product and connects it to a personal interest in photography. This gives their project direction and shows genuine motivation, which strengthens the planning section.
Criteria A: Planning
0
4
8
Criteria Feedback
The student shows an interesting and relevant learning goal connected to photography and yearbook production.
There is an attempt to include success criteria for the intended product rather than only naming the product itself.
The plan shows some awareness that the project needs to move through stages such as photo collection, design, editing, and printing.
The learning goal is too broad and is not yet stated in a fully measurable way.
The success criteria contain vague language such as “authentic theme” and “great feedback,” which makes them difficult to assess objectively.
The plan is not yet detailed or fully feasible, because it does not clearly sequence stages, resources, and deadlines.
The success criteria could be strengthened by making them testable and specific, for example by defining the number of layouts or what counts as successful quality.
1.1·Weakness
Page 1• Click to view
The student's learning goal is interesting, but it is still broad. They should make the goal more measurable by stating what specific photographic differences they will investigate and how they will judge success.
1.2·Suggestion
Page 2• Click to view
Turn this into a more feasible plan by naming the main stages, resources, and deadlines. A brief sequence for photo collection, design, editing, and printing would make the plan much stronger.
1.3·Suggestion
Page 4• Click to view
Consider rewriting each criterion as a testable statement. For example, specify the number of distinct layouts, the expected design features, and what “good and neat” will look like in practice.
1.4·Weakness
Page 4• Click to view
This success criterion is not yet fully measurable because terms like “authentic theme” and “great feedback” are vague. Define what evidence would count, such as a checklist or a specific feedback threshold.
Criteria B: Applying skills
0
4
8
Criteria Feedback
The student explains why research skills matter to the overall goal, showing an awareness of how ATL skills support achievement.
There is some evidence of linking ATL skills to the product through discussion of the yearbook-making process.
The response reflects a developing understanding that skill use should influence the quality of the final outcome.
The explanation of ATL skills is still too general and often describes what was researched rather than how it changed decisions.
There are few concrete examples showing how a specific skill directly improved the product.
The connection between ATL skill use and the quality of the final yearbook is not consistently made explicit.
Some points feel reflective in tone but do not yet explain the ATL skill in action through design, problem-solving, or editing decisions.
2.1·Strength
Page 8• Click to view
The student explains why research skills mattered to their goal and shows how they supported their decisions. This is a solid link between ATL skills and achievement of the learning goal.
2.2·Suggestion
Page 9• Click to view
To strengthen this section, show the effect of the ATL skill on the final product. For example, explain which photo-taking technique improved image quality or made a page more successful.
2.3·Weakness
Page 9• Click to view
The student describes sources and facts, but they do not clearly explain how the research changed their work. They should add direct examples of decisions they made because of the research, not just what they read.
2.4·Weakness
Page 10• Click to view
This is reflective in tone, but it does not yet explain a specific ATL skill in action. The student should link the skill to a concrete design or problem-solving decision they made while producing the yearbook.
2.5·Question
Page 11• Click to view
How did the decisions the student made while building the yearbook improve its quality compared with their first draft? Identifying one or two specific changes would make their application of skills more convincing.
Criteria C: Reflecting
Criteria Feedback
The student clearly states that the product was achieved and uses class feedback as part of the reflection.
There is an attempt to connect the evaluation to the work process and personal growth.
The response shows some awareness that reflection should consider how learning can influence future tasks.
The evaluation is still too close to restating the criteria rather than judging them with evidence.
The reflection does not yet thoroughly evaluate each criterion separately, so the justification for success is incomplete.
Feedback from classmates is mentioned, but it is not explained in enough detail to show what specific evidence supports the evaluation.
The reflection would be stronger if it identified specific changes for future projects and explained why those habits would be effective.