Wide and generally appropriate lexical range (قاضياً، مطرقة الحكم، نسيج المجتمع)
Effective use of both basic and some complex grammatical structures
Communication remained clear despite occasional errors
Register and tone consistent and suitably formal
Frequent comma-splices and run-on sentences hinder readability
Repetition of high-frequency terms limits nuance
Spelling slips (المتنمرين/حلول, هر مونات→هرمونات) and typos (الجزع→الجزء)
Some agreement errors and missing case endings
Coherent description of the image shows effort to engage
Some attempt to draw observations relevant to a perceived theme
Presentation is largely irrelevant to a literary extract
No quotations or direct references to the required text
Observations remain superficial and unsupported
Responses are consistently relevant and appropriate to the prompts
Answers extend beyond minimal statements, offering justifications and personal views
Dialogue shows clear development across multiple questions
Some questions were left partially unanswered
Depth varies and could be enhanced with more concrete examples
Interaction is mostly sustained with clear anticipation of examiner prompts
Prepared follow-ups indicate strong comprehension and willingness to engage
Responses demonstrate understanding with minimal need for repetition
Interaction remains largely scripted with limited spontaneous contributions
Independent initiative in steering the exchange is not strongly evidenced