IB Personal Project (MYP) SL External Assessment Example

The student states a clear, relevant learning goal with a strong personal and academic focus. The topic is appropriately ambitious for a Personal Project and gives them a solid direction for later planning and reflection.

The student makes a convincing connection between their topic and their own experience. This helps explain why the project matters to them and strengthens the authenticity of their planning.

This criterion is too broad to evaluate well. Specify how accessibility will be measured, for example by naming the platform, sharing method, or technical features that make the website usable for a global audience.

This success criterion is not measurable enough yet. The student could make it more specific by defining what counts as “cohesive” or “appealing,” so they can judge success using clear evidence rather than personal impression.

The student includes a clear action plan and explains how it supports their workflow. This shows purposeful planning rather than simply listing tasks.

The student's plan includes concrete actions and a logical sequence for research. This makes the product goal feel feasible and shows good forward thinking.

The student clearly shows how they organized their research to support both the learning goal and the product. That structure helps demonstrate purposeful use of ATL research skills.

The student uses a strong primary source that is closely connected to their topic. Interviewing an experienced professional adds credibility and shows initiative in gathering relevant evidence.

The student identifies relevance here, but the explanation is still generic. They should push further by explaining exactly what idea, statistic, or example from the source shaped their research or improved the quality of their website.

The student's OPVL evaluation is sensible, but it stays quite general. They should strengthen this by explaining how the limitation affects the usefulness of the source for their specific research question, not just its reliability in theory.

The student gives a specific example of a challenge during product development and explains how they responded. This is strong evidence of applying self-management to improve the website.

The student clearly identifies a relevant ATL skill and connects it directly to the product goal. This helps make their applying-skills section focused and purposeful.

To make the plan stronger, the student should add brief checkpoints or deadlines for each day. That would show clearer sequencing and make it easier to judge whether their time management was effective.