IB Personal Project (MYP) External Assessment Exemplar

Detailed structure and categorization of research showcasing effective use of information-literacy skills

Comprehensive OPVL evaluation of a primary interview, enhancing source credibility

Clear explanation of self-management strategies, including use of a process journal to track progress

Thorough source collection table integrating relevance, type, and rationale, demonstrating research depth and organization

Supplementary research questions are exhaustive but require prioritization to maintain focus and manageability

Impact of content condensation is described qualitatively but lacks quantitative evidence (e.g., before/after word counts)

Reflection on time management does not address deviations from the weekly planner or how they were managed

Web development questions are not yet explicitly linked to success criteria, risking misalignment between research and product requirements

Effective connection of personal experience across continents to the project topic, enhancing motivation and relevance

Well-structured success criteria table covering aesthetics, functionality, and user needs

Clear timeline outlining key milestones for product development

Insufficient detail on platform-specific functionalities and required development resources to ensure feasibility

Success criteria are broad and not yet quantifiable; benchmarks from competitor analyses are needed to justify target standards

Learning goal is articulated but lacks measurable outcomes or metrics (e.g., number of case studies, engagement statistics)

Timeline does not specify stakeholder roles or resource allocation, limiting accountability

User-interface evaluation is well-supported with a clear rating and constructive feedback, demonstrating data-driven reflection

Thoughtful analysis of personal and academic growth, with links to future study plans

Thorough self-evaluation of aesthetic elements, backed by survey evidence

Survey visualization lacks contextual data on sample size and respondent demographics, limiting reliability

Reflection on improved research skills is general; it would benefit from a concrete example of how these skills enhanced a specific website section

Accessibility limitations are identified but next steps for improvement (e.g., responsive testing, custom domain acquisition) are not specified

Evaluation of the final product against each success criterion could be more systematically documented with direct evidence for every criterion