Effective integration of diverse information literacy strategies (videos, e-books, expert interviews)
Disciplined self-management via digital tools (Asana, reminders) to track tasks and meet deadlines
Adaptive problem-solving in prototype design (selecting optimal bottle size)
Rigorous source evaluation using the CRAAP method and MYBib citations
Use of a visual prototype to guide construction and minimize trial-and-error
Iterative creative thinking through multiple prototypes and feedback cycles
Strong digital literacy evidenced by citation tool integration
Clearly articulated learning goal rooted in personal experience
Convincing connection between childhood garden memories and project focus
Introduction is overly detailed and could be condensed to highlight objectives
Success criteria are not measurable and need specific indicators (e.g., number of plants harvested)
Project plan lacks sequencing, clear dependencies and resource allocation
Short-term goals missing detailed deadlines, resources and order of tasks
Global context is mentioned but not explicitly linked to project objectives
Success criteria rubric is comprehensive yet misaligned and difficult to navigate
Thoughtful mind map outlining post-project improvements
Environmental sustainability assessment linked to SDG-2 with clear carbon-sink rationale
Inclusion of authentic audience feedback via email
Reflective insight into personal growth beyond the project (singing audition confidence)
Connection between improved research skills and higher academic performance
Aesthetics evaluation is descriptive but lacks quantitative data or direct audience quotes