Wireframes that clearly map user journeys and early navigation flows
Use of iterative design and creative problem-solving to refine key features
Effective application of information literacy through diverse, credible research
Structured use of Cornell notes to document and link research questions to findings
A polished interactive splash screen prototype demonstrating strong prototyping skills
Limited critical evaluation of informal multimedia tutorials to assess their credibility
Lack of quantitative metrics (e.g., task completion rates, error counts) to demonstrate how features meet user needs
Articulation of a precise learning goal with three measurable UI/UX principles
Clear linkage of personal interest in cricket and prior design work to the learning goal
A compelling, well-defined product goal targeting a specific user need
Lack of sequencing and explicit resource references (software tools, timelines) in the success criteria table
Survey sample size (n=20) is small, limiting the generalizability of the findings
Action plan would benefit from specific deadlines and resource allocations to enhance accountability
Multi-perspective evaluation of aesthetics (self, user, expert) that triangulates feedback
Candid strengths vs. limitations table showing deep self-awareness
Clear articulation of IB Learner Profile growth (inquirer, thinker)
Synthesis of peer and expert feedback in the page layout evaluation with concrete examples
Safety evaluation lacks features for user reporting and blocking to enhance privacy
Reflections on conceptual learning are not explicitly linked back to each success criterion
Improvement plan is broad; prioritization of the top two areas would sharpen focus for the next iteration